The UAE will host Expo 2020!
  • Arabic
Supported by the UAE National Media Council
We are in the process of developing and improving our website, and we invite you to participate in our brief survey to measure the level of your satisfaction
Satisfaction Survey For UAE Interact Website
رغبة منا بالتعرف على مستوى رضاكم عن موقعنا وبهدف تطويره وتحسينه، فقد قمنا بتصميم استبيان سريع لقياس مدى الرضا عن موقع دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة روعي في تصميم الاستبيان أن يكون قصيرا وسريعا كي لا نطيل عليكم، وعليه نرجو منكم التكرم باستكماله عن طريق الرابط التالي
استبيان رضا المتعاملين عن موقع دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة

Arabs oppose attack on Iraq says UAE

posted on 28/03/2002: 1141 views


The UAE said yesterday all Arab states are opposed to a U.S. military strike on Iraq, but former officials and experts from the United States believe such an attack will be launched with the aim of ousting President Saddam Hussain. Sheikh Hamdan bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, dismissed statements by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney that most Arab countries are not opposed to a military action against Baghdad following his visit to the UAE and other regional states last week.



"The UAE stresses within an Arab consensus on the firm stand which opposes a military strike against any Arab country under any excuse," Sheikh Hamdan told the Arabic language daily Al Ittihad. "Instead, there should be peaceful means to resolve any issue or conflict because the biggest and only loser of such strikes is the people." Other Arab nations have expressed similar positions and warned a fresh U.S. offensive on Iraq would be disastrous to the region and world peace. But U.S. officials have not stopped sending signals that the U.S. would carry out its threats and attack Iraq while former officials and experts believe such a strike is inevitable and would target Saddam himself.



Such fiery statements have not abated although Baghdad has given indications that it might let UN arms inspectors back into Iraq, a key Western demand. "It is almost certain that the U.S. will launch a military campaign against the Saddam regime," said Dr George Gause, associate professor of political science at the U.S. University of Vermont. "Even more so because the circumstances under which this military campaign could be prevented are unlikely to materialise." Dr Gause presented his views in a lecture at the Emirates Centre for Research and Studies about the "U.S. policy towards Iraq in the aftermath of September 11."



He said the attack could be launched under the cover of destroying Iraq's programme to rebuild its weapons of mass destruction. But its real target is toppling the Iraqi president and installing a new regime. "Since September 11, it is clear that U.S. President George Bush has decided to make the unseating of Saddam Hussain a major foreign policy goal of the Administration. The question is not whether there will be a major American initiative in this area but rather when it will happen," he said. "There does not appear to be, as yet, a clear American blueprint for how Saddam will be unseated but there is an unmistakable orientation toward direct, aggressive action against the Iraqi regime."



But Dr Gause said the U.S. Administration is facing hurdles in such an offensive, including the extent of the attack, support by the United Nations and regional countries, the military facilities needed in some regional states for such an offensive, and the type of regime that will replace Saddam. He cited U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell as saying recently that if there will be a military action it "ought to be massive and short." "Yet this would most likely imply the deployment of ground troops for which support of other Gulf states, mainly Saudi Arabia, is needed," he said. "But as long as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is in the focus of media and popular attention, this support will be difficult to obtain." He said he believes the political infrastructure in Iraq is clearly not ready for a new stable regime while Iran could get involved in Iraq if Saddam is ousted.



"Iran certainly has the most assets to play a role in post-Saddam Iraq: Iran has a long border with Iraq, is home to many members of the Shiite opposition groups, and there are links to Iraqi Kurdistan." "The details are extremely important here and clearly have not been worked out. Any campaign must be better prepared than in 1991...however, the determination of the U.S. Administration to do something is absolutely clear."



In a separate lecture in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, former U.S. secretary of state James Baker strongly hinted Iraq would be the next target of the US-led international campaign against terror following the September 11 suicide bombings in New York and Washington. He said he understood Bush's controversial decision to refer to Iraq, Iran and North Korea as "an axis of evil."



"The president's point is really a simple one," said Baker, who was secretary of state in the administration of former president George Bush, who led the 1991 war against Iraq following the invasion of Kuwait. "It is that the United States will prevent terrorists and regimes that seek to develop or to proliferate weapons of mass destruction from threatening the United States or countries allied with it. To my mind, this point is not just understandable. It is irrefutable." (The Gulf News)

RELATED ARTICLES

19 June 2017 Abdullah bin Zayed opens new building of UAE Embassy in Norway
19 June 2017 Abdullah bin Zayed, Norway's counterpart discuss latest regional, global issues
19 June 2017 Abdullah bin Zayed visits the Viking Ship Museum in Oslo
08 June 2017 Qatar should commit to rules of security, stability of Gulf: Gargash
22 May 2017 Abdullah bin Zayed hails Arab leaders' resolve to combat extremism and terrorism


Most Read